home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- > Petr said :
- > > > The only way to do it is like this or like the FX-card, but the Hawk will
- > > > be _much_ faster. Wizztronic have said that it's even faster than the
- > > > Afterburner. I guess the 256kbyte cache is responsible for this and that it
- > > ^^^^^^^^^
- > > that can't be true. 040 is 040 ;-)
- >
- > Yes, but perhaps the difference is low between a 040 put on a 16-32
- > bus, and a 030 put on a 32 bit bus, with a big cache ? The 040 is far more
- > powerful, but if it must wait for the bus to work...:(
- >
- > Yann
-
- Thats what I thought.
- When I saw Doug at the Xmas Atari World shows he said that the slow down of the bus and
- ST-RAM (and that the screen redraws are done from ST-RAM) causes the AfterBurners
- FPS to drop from a constant 50 FPS to what it tests out to be ...
-
- Another point is is it possible for someone to create 16 bit 'dummy' textures which Doug
- could implement into BM ???
- Just to show that the Falcon can excell in certain areas ...
-
- -Simon
- Internet: c4sy@dmu.ac.uk
- URL: http://www.cms.dmu.ac.uk/~c4sy/ *Have a peek !*
-
-